Rebels: Mazar-i-Sharif
is Ours
Friday, Nov. 09, 2001 This key city has apparently fallen to the Northern Alliance. That could change the strategic equation in Afghanistan. The Taliban spent three years fighting for Mazar-i-Sharif, precisely because its capture would confirm them as masters of all Afghanistan. And that they are no longer. Sources reached by TIME inside the city on Friday confirmed claims by Northern Alliance generals Rashid Dostum and Ustad Atta Mohammed to have recaptured Mazar-i-Sharif. |
|
Nov 4 bombing |
Taliban forces reportedly withdrew from the city
after a bloody 90-minute battle at its southern entrance which began late
in the afternoon, local time, triggering jubilant celebrations among the
townspeople whose ethnic and political affinities are with the Northern
Alliance.
"The people in Mazar-i-Sharif were very happy when we marched in," Haji Jamil, an aide to General Mohammed, told TIME. "They sacrificed many sheep, because many of the soldiers were originally rom Mazar and their families were still living in the city, |
so they sacrificed the sheep in front of them." Alliance commanders claim to have killed some 250 Taliban, most of them Pakistani and Arab volunteers, and captured a further 500, although none of these claims can be verified. Rather than fight to the finish, however, Alliance commanders say the Taliban retreated north and east after a fierce battle involving troops, tanks and Taliban artillery at the southern gateway to the city. |
Situated about 100 miles from the Uzbekistan border, Mazar-e Sharif
is hardly a central city in Afghanistan, nor is it the country's most populated
or industrialized. It is not a Taliban stronghold like Kandahar or a political
symbol like Kabul.
But in a country with only a handful of major cities, experts say Mazar-e Sharif serves a crucial role in supplying the Taliban and holding back opposition forces. Several military, political and psychological factors, they add, could make the city the first domino in the downfall of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban. 1. Timing
2. 'Land bridge'
"We're interested in it because it would provide a land bridge up to Uzbekistan, which provides us, among other things, a humanitarian pathway for us to move supplies out of Central Asia and down into Afghanistan," Gen. Tommy Franks, commander of U.S. forces in southwest Asia, said Thursday. U.S. troops could also move in, en masse and with heavy equipment, more efficiently by land than by any other means. CNN correspondents on the ground warn that poor terrain, weather and roads may make re-supply over land a challenge, at least until the conditions improve and the convoys can be protected. The Pentagon has said troops from besides the United States might provide security along this land bridge. 3. Air bases
The city's largest airfield is thought to be sub-standard, littered with the remains of old Soviet tanks, and likely damaged by recent airstrikes. It might also be a target for Taliban lurking in the surrounding mountains, and has not been as sought-after as the Bagram air base just north of Kabul. But the United States has the capability to quickly revamp such a facility and defend it. Put into use, an airfield would give allied forces a staging ground to fly in increased humanitarian aid, military supplies and possibly U.S. forces, while launching airstrikes deeper inside Afghanistan. 4. Cutting off the Taliban
Military, food, oil and other supplies from north of the country -- be it Uzbekistan, Tajikistan or elsewhere -- have traditionally flowed through Mazar-e Sharif first on their way southeast toward Kabul, west toward Herat, or south to Kandahar. Given the U.S. airstrikes, an international crackdown on Taliban and al Qaeda financial assets and the ruling militia's general political isolation, the Taliban were likely struggling for food, supplies and ammunition well before the fall of Mazar-e Sharif. If that should happen, the Northern Alliance would effectively control the northern section of Afghanistan -- clearly its strongest military position in years. Especially if Kabul falls, the Taliban would find themselves increasingly isolated in the nation's south. 5. Psychological impact
The fall of Mazar-e Sharif may persuade Afghan warlords, who have a long history of switching to the winning side, to foresee the war's outcome and actively throw their support behind the Northern Alliance and fellow opposition forces. The city's religious significance -- the brother-in-law of the Muslim prophet Mohammed is buried near a Mazar-e Sharif mosque -- adds to its potential impact. In the United States, the capture of Mazar-e Sharif may quell domestic concerns of a perceived lack of progress on the military front. It might also serve to partially satiate some, such as Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and other Arab leaders, who have been calling for a quick end to the U.S.-led military campaign in Afghanistan. |
ONE OF THE COMMANDERS, Mohammed Mohaqik, said anti-Taliban forces quickly
seized three northern provincial capitals: Shibarghan in Jozjan province,
Aybak in Samangan province and Maimana in Faryab province. Other commanders
said a fourth province, Sara-i-Pol, had also been captured.
There was no comment from the Taliban on the opposition claims, and no foreign reporters were in the area to confirm them. Taking Aybak would cut the main escape route for Taliban soldiers withdrawing from Mazar-e-Sharif to Kabul. Military analysts said that if the other towns had also fallen, the ruling Taliban militia could be abandoning large swaths of territory populated by ethnic minorities and redeploying its forces to defend Kabul, the capital, and other strongholds. Gen. Rashid Dostum, the ethnic Uzbek former ruler of the Mazar-e-Sharif region, told Reuters his troops were advancing Saturday on western Badghis in a move that would allow him to join his troops with those of Ismail Khan, a mujahedeen general leading a separate rebellion near the strategic western city of Herat. In recent days, Khan’s forces claim to have cut the Taliban route toward Herat while killing 31 Taliban fighters and capturing 27 — though the claim could not be verified. Herat is the key city in the northwest, straddling the main route into Iran. Khan was its governor before the Taliban threw him out in 1995. Moreover, anti-Taliban troops also took control of Hairatan on the Afghan border with Uzbekistan, according to alliance officials; Dostum told Reuters the northern border with Uzbekistan along the Amu Darya river was under his control. The border remains closed, sealed by Uzbekistan with barbed wire and guards. However, U.S. officials said the Uzbek government sent a delegation to the city of Termez on the Afghan border to arrange transport of U.S.-backed humanitarian aid across the border by river barge. The team was expected to arrive Sunday. The capture of Mazar-e-Sharif and the northern border was notable for its potential to open a supply route from the Uzbek border. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said Saturday that opening the border for aid delivery “has been one of the key goals” of the United States and its allies. ‘CITY IS QUIET’
|
Goto: Afghanistan